How to be ethical—and philosophically so!
Neven Sesardic
(Lingnan University, Hong Kong:
sesardic@ln.edu.hk)
Even those obsessed with money,
like people from Hong Kong,
never ignore completely
the battle between right and wrong.
Although human nature
is red in tooth and claw,
the ugly beast within us
is constrained by moral law.
Three cheers for philosophers
who explained how ethics works;
they help us make good choices
and not be total jerks.
Socrates showed that no one
is ever wicked, oh no!
People’s misdeeds are due to
something they don’t know.
Therefore the right response
is not to kick their ass,
but rather to enroll them
in a philosophy class.
Once they get acquainted
with the idea of the good
they’ll turn into bleeding hearts
and act exactly as they should.
Kant taught us important lessons:
First, that we should never lie,
even if our sincerity
makes innocent people die.
Second, that justice should be done
though the heavens fall,
even if the only survivors
are dreadful bugs that crawl.
If this Kantian doctrine
sounds odd and perhaps absurd,
luckily there’s another view
that also deserves to be heard.
This is consequentialism,
which claims that it’s only humane
to compare our actions’ effects
in terms of pleasure and pain:
Do always, with no exception,
what advances happiness most
(counting people and animals,
but not plants or the Holy Ghost).
The leader of that movement
is notorious Peter Singer,
a big Kahuna at Princeton,
and, of course, a left-winger.
He says we’re all moral monsters
if we don’t buy a lot of food
for all those complete strangers
who happen to be poor and screwed.
A household needs per year
just 30,000 bucks,
if it’s spent on necessities
but not on anything deluxe.
Everything else that remains
should go to those in need.
So write a fat check to Oxfam,
don’t be a slave to greed!
Buying a gift for your daughter
instead of feeding chaps you’ve never seen
is an act that stands condemned
as cruel and even obscene.
Next, people are just one species,
and not a special one, at that.
Our lives do not always weigh
more than those of a pig or rat.
Hence it may be that letting
a monkey enjoy his banana
takes precedence over helping
a dying old man in Montana.
Singer goes even further
and says there’s no ground for shame
if you’re more attracted to animals
than to a man or dame.
So don’t worry if some bigots
exclaim that sex with pets is yuck.
Just go ahead with your hanky panky,
and try to have a good … time.