
2025 Comparative Social Policy Symposium
Aligning Lives and Systems: Cultural, Institutional, and Policy Perspectives on Well-being
Date: 2 November 2025 (Sunday)
Time: 9:00 AM – 5:30 PM
Venue: Room201/2, Lau Lee Yuen Haan Amenities Building, Lingnan University
Registration Link:
https://webapp.ln.edu.hk/sys/regbuilder/registration/Comparative-Social-Policy-Symposium-2025
Booklet of the Symposium: Click Here

Professor LEE Kristen (The State University of New York at Buffalo)
Biography
Kristen Schultz Lee is a professor in the UB Department of Sociology and Criminology who studies gender, family and the life course in a comparative perspective. Her research leverages variation in social context (e.g., changes in policy or government, differences across time, differences between countries, differences among states) to better understand how social context shapes individual beliefs, behaviors, emotional well-being, and family outcomes. In other research, she investigates education and inequality among children and adolescents. Her research has been supported by the Japan Foundation, the Spencer Foundation and the Fulbright Foundation.
Abstract
Research on happiness and well-being is mainstream in the public discourse, discussed widely in policy circles, academia, and the popular media. Across the social sciences, it is flourishing, with each discipline making their own contributions to the discovery of the sources of happiness and of unhappiness. My research showcases the sociologist’s contribution: what makes people happy depends on the social-institutional context. Accounting for social context allows sociologists to observe that what makes people happy in one social setting may not do so in another. An individual’s well-being is conceptualized as shaped by social status characteristics (e.g., gender and class) and as rooted in family and interpersonal relationships. While economists search for a universal model of happiness, sociologists seek answers that are specific to the institutional context. After detailing the sociological perspective on happiness, I will discuss the findings from my past international empirical research on happiness and my current research on well-being in a relational context.

Professor ROJAS Mariano (Tecnológico Nacional de México)
Biography
Mariano Rojas holds a PhD in Economics from The Ohio State University. His research focuses on happiness, well-being, quality of life, social progress, and economic development in Latin America. With over 140 academic publications, he has made significant contributions to these areas, authoring three books: The Scientific Study of Happiness, Can Economics Bring Happiness? , and Well-being in Latin America: Drivers and Policies. He has also edited 11 books, including The Economics of Happiness, Handbook of Happiness Research in Latin America, and Measuring Progress and Well-Being: Proposals from Latin America.
Mariano Rojas served as President of the International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies and coordinated the Measuring the Progress of Societies initiative in Mexico, which acted as the Latin American correspondent for the OECD’s Global Project. He is also a member of Mexico’s National Research System.
Abstract
This presentation empirically explores the hierarchy of human needs, drawing on data from Latin America. Using the subjective well-being approach, it identifies the human needs whose fulfillment has the most profound impact on overall well-being. It then investigates the factors that meet these needs, with a particular emphasis on one key type of interpersonal relationship: person-based relationships. Finally, the presentation critiques the shortcomings of current social programs -such as poverty alleviation initiatives- that focus primarily on increasing income, while overlooking other crucial factors. In conclusion, it advocates for the design of more comprehensive social policies that account for all relevant factors that satisfy human needs.

Professor FOSTER Liam (University of Sheffield)
Biography
Liam Foster is a Professor in Social Policy, and Co-Director of CIRCLE (Centre for International Research on Care, Labour and Equalities) at the University of Sheffield, UK. He specializes in theories of ageing, pensions, extending working lives, care and social inequalities. In total, Professor Foster has authored over 70 publications in peer-reviewed journals and book chapters and has authored or edited eight books.
Abstract
Responses to the challenges of ageing in Europe and beyond have largely focused on productivist notions of active ageing, with more comprehensive responses tending to be reactive and largely remedial. This approach prioritizes the extension of working life (EWLs) and individual responsibility to reduce the ‘burden’ of population ageing. This presentation will briefly identify some of the key challenges and responses associated with demographic ageing, including active ageing. Using the example of the UK, it will define and chart the development of active ageing responses to demographic change, and the emergence of the EWLs agenda. It will then focus on pension measures associated with extended working lives, including raising the pension age, restricting access to early retirement, and providing a stronger link between pension benefits and contributions, indicating how they incentivise remaining in the labour market. However, it will also show that opportunities and choices to extend working lives have not been experienced equally, with implications for well-being in retirement. In practice most of these policies are gender blind. Women’s existing employment and pension disadvantages have been largely ignored in the development of EWLs policy, which has perpetuated or expanded many women’s financial disadvantages in older age. It highlights the need for a greater focus on gendered inequalities in the development of EWLs policy, in order to ensure they don’t adversely impact on women’s financial circumstances and well-being in later life. This needs to be considered in the context of a wider more inclusive and comprehensive life course focused approach to active ageing.

Professor CRUZ C Joy ( University of the Philippines)
Biography
Dr. Christian Joy Pattawi Cruz is an Assistant Professor and Academic Program Coordinator at the University of the Philippines Population Institute (UPPI). She holds a Master in Business Administration and Master of Arts in Demography degrees from the University of the Philippines and earned her PhD in Public Policy from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Her research interests span a range of topics, including formal demography, ageing, survey methodology, and public policy. Dr. Cruz has played a key role in major research initiatives such as the Longitudinal Study of Ageing and Health in the Philippines, National Migration Survey, Young Adult Fertility and Sexuality Study, and the Hong Kong Generations and Gender Survey. She served as the President of the Philippine Population Association from 2023 to 2025.
Abstract
This study examines and explains the economic wellbeing disparity between two rapidly developing Southeast Asian nations, Viet Nam and the Philippines. Macro-level indicators, such as the Human Development Index (HDI) and Gross Domestic Product (GDP per capita, show broad similarities between these two countries, however, micro-level indicators reveal a stark difference in the economic resilience of their older populations. Baseline data from the Longitudinal Study of Ageing and Health in the Philippines (LSAHP) and the Longitudinal Study of Aging and Health in Viet Nam (LSAHV) show that a significantly higher proportion of older Filipinos report difficulty meeting household expenses (57.0%) and experiencing household hunger (13.5%) compared to their Vietnamese counterparts (15% and 0.9%, respectively). This analysis seeks to resolve this research puzzle: Why does it appear that older Vietnamese are economically better off than older Filipinos?
This study first explores conventional explanations — including living arrangements, filial piety, and retirement preparedness — and argues that these factors, which show converging experiences between the two countries, may be insufficient to explain the observed economic gap. In addition, the study suggests that the disparity may be rooted in three deeper, country-level structural differences between Viet Nam and the Philippines: a) the contrasting political systems and corruption experiences (a Democratic Republic versus a One-Party Socialist Republic versus a Democratic Republic), b) differences in religion (Buddhism versus Roman Catholicism), and c) the divergent societal implementation of egalitarianism as influenced by colonial and post-regime histories.
There is a complex interplay of these macro- and micro-level factors that influence the differences in the economic wellbeing of older people in these two countries. Understanding the interrelationship of these factors is needed in order to develop appropriate and targeted policies and programs to ensure positive economic wellbeing of older people in Viet Nam and the Philippines.

Professor ARAKI Satoshi (The University of Hong Kong)
Biography
Satoshi Araki holds his DPhil in sociology from the University of Oxford and an MA/BA from the University of Tokyo. Prior to starting his academic career, he had extensively contributed to policy-making as a consultant of the World Bank/Global Partnership for Education, a researcher of the Mitsubishi Research Institute, and a fellow of the Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization - Regional Centre for Higher Education and Development (SEAMEO-RIHED), among others.
His current research ranges from social stratification and inequality to the sociology of education and work, family issues, well-being, and research methods. In addition to more than 50 policy papers, Prof Araki has published his work in top journals across disciplines, including the American Sociological Review, Socio-Economic Review, Social Science & Medicine, Sociology, European Sociological Review, British Journal of Sociology, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Higher Education, Social Psychological and Personality Science, Journal of Happiness Studies, Social Indicators Research, and Journal of Applied Gerontology.
Abstract
Research argues that highly educated individuals are more likely than their less-educated counterparts to be happy, particularly through enhanced economic outcomes. Recent evidence further shows that this happiness return to education has increased over the past decades in tandem with societal-level educational expansion. However, we know little about (1) whether everyone can expect equal happiness returns to higher education (heterogeneous effects) and (2) how the potentially heterogeneous happiness returns to education vary across societies (cross-national patterns). From a gender and comparative perspective, this paper investigates the happiness premium for higher education across genders and its cross-national variation. Using data from the latest OECD Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC) for over 54,000 individuals in 25 countries and leveraging several mediation analysis techniques, the study reveals (1) higher education contributes to happiness in most countries; (2) the education-happiness linkage is substantially gendered, with women likely to receive smaller premiums due to the limited economic return to education; and (3) the degree and mechanisms of gender inequality differ substantially across societies. Some implications and the potential for future research are discussed.

Professor CHEN Xi Celia (Lingnan University)
Biography
Dr. Xi Chen is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at Lingnan University. Her research examines the social determinants of health, with a focus on mental health, substance abuse, and health inequality. Dr. Chen’s work has been recognized with several prestigious awards, including the Early Career Researcher Award (Runner-up) at Lingnan University (2025), the Asian Journal of Criminology Best Article Award (2021), and a Best Conference Paper Award (Third Award) from the Asian Association for Substance Abuse Research (2025). She was also a recipient of the Harvard-Yenching Institute Fellowship (2013─2014).
Abstract
Ageism against older adults is a global concern with significant implications for health and well-being. While the individual-level consequences of ageism are well-documented, the moderating role of structural sociopolitical factors remains underexplored. This study addresses these gaps by examining the relationship between perceived ageism and subjective well-being among older adults and investigating how macro-level sociopolitical conditions, such as economic conditions, political systems, and cultural values, moderate these effects. This study utilizes data from Wave 6 of the World Values Survey, comprising 15,697 older adults (aged 55+) across 43 countries. The results show that perceived ageism was negatively associated with both life satisfaction and happiness, after adjusting for sociodemographic variables and macro-level sociopolitical factors. Higher GDP per capita mitigated these adverse effects, suggesting that economic prosperity buffers against the negative impact of ageism. Conversely, political stability unexpectedly amplified the detrimental effects of ageism on subjective well-being. Additionally, long-term cultural orientation strengthened the negative association between age-related stereotypes and well-being, while individualism did not exhibit a significant moderating effect. These findings highlight the crucial role of structural conditions in shaping the well-being outcomes of ageism. By demonstrating how economic and political contexts influence the consequences of ageism, this study provides valuable insights for policymakers aiming to develop targeted interventions and policies that promote the well-being of older populations.

Professor KÜHNER Stefan (Lingnan University)
Biography
Stefan obtained his Ph.D. from the Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, United Kingdom. He joined Lingnan University in August 2016. His research interests centre on comparative social policy, poverty and well-being, and research methods. Stefan is the Editor of the Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy (Cambridge University Press) and the Research in Comparative and Global Social Policy book series (Bristol University Press). Stefan is the Director of the Department’s MSocSc Programme in Comparative Social Policy (International).
Abstract
This Presentation employs a Rawlsian perspective on social justice to analyse subjective well-being outcomes among children aged 6-14 from 23 societies worldwide. Combining Wave 3 (2016-2019) of the International Survey of Children’s Lives and Well-being (Children’s Worlds) with fuzzy-set ideal type analysis (FSITA), it goes beyond ranking these societies from ‘best’ to ‘worst’, instead classifying them on the extent to which they meet the conditions of Rawls’s model society. Inequalities in child well-being outcomes are observed in all societies. Here, extending ideas advanced in UNICEF Innocenti’s (2016) Report Card 13: Fairness for Children, the Presentation asks whether it is possible to establish when and where these “inequalities” in children’s subjective well-being become “inequities.” The analysis finds no perfect cases, but highlights several societies, including Spain (Catalonia), Belgium, Hungary, and Norway, as closest to meeting a Rawlsian notion of “justice as fairness”.
Keywords
Social justice – equity – inequality – child well-being – fuzzy set analysis

Professor OLIVOS Francisco (Lingnan University)
Biography
Francisco Olivos obtained his PhD in Sociology from The Chinese University of Hong Kong. He also holds a master’s degree in Sociology and Social Research from Utrecht University, The Netherlands, and a master’s degree in Sociology from Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. His research lies at the intersection of subjective well-being, social stratification, and cultural sociology, with a particular focus on how cultural values and institutional contexts shape people’s perceptions of justice and life satisfaction.
He is the Principal Investigator of the General Research Fund (GRF) project “Institutional Logics and Subjective Well-Being Across Nations,” which investigates how macro- and micro-level cultural determinants interact to influence individual well-being across diverse societies. His broader research agenda combines experimental and comparative methods to understand the cultural foundations of inequality, and happiness in different cultural settings. His work has been published in leading international journals such as The British Journal of Sociology, Poetics, Social Science Research, and the Journal of Happiness Research, among others.
Abstract
A longstanding body of literature has examined the link between culture and happiness, yet culture is often reduced to shared country-level values. This study introduces a framework that applies a multi-level approach and the concept of structural fit. We view culture as both a macro-level phenomenon and an individual-level manifestation, while also recognizing it as a dimension of broader social structures. Structural fit captures the alignment between individuals’ cultural orientations and objective social structures. We illustrate this framework by examining how the consistency between individuals’ perceptions of democracy and wider social structures shapes well-being. Using data from the joint EVS/WVS 2017–2022, we show that perceptions of democracy significantly influence happiness, especially when they align with both actual democratic conditions and collective representations of democracy. Our findings demonstrate that when personal perceptions align with society’s shared understanding and political realities, individuals report substantially higher levels of happiness.
Keywords:
happiness, cultural sociology, cultural differences, structural fit

