Joint survey of Lingnan University and South China University of Technology shows Greater Bay Area residents think mainland is doing a better job in fighting COVID-19 than Hong Kong and Macau

Co-founded by Lingnan University and South China University of Technology, the “Joint Research Centre for Greater Bay Area - Social Policy & Governance” released a survey entitled “Greater Bay Area mainland residents’ evaluation of COVID-19 measures and impression of Hong Kong and Macau” today (April 16). The survey shows that mainland residents in the Great Bay Area (GBA) believe their local governments to be more effective in measures of epidemic prevention compared to the Hong Kong and Macau governments.

 

The online questionnaire was conducted in early April, and successfully surveyed 1,040 mainland residents aged 18 or above living in the nine mainland cities of GBA (including Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan, Dongguan, Zhuhai, Zhongshan, Huizhou, Jiangmen and Zhaoqing). With 10 being “very good” and 0 representing “not ideal”, the survey invited respondents to give scores to medical staff, their local governments, and the Hong Kong and Macau governments regarding performance in epidemic prevention.

 

The results show that  medical staff received the highest score of 9.41. As for the governments in mainland GBA, Hong Kong and Macau, mainland governments had the best score with an average of 8.61, with Zhuhai getting the highest mark (8.88) in the nine mainland cities followed by Dongguan (8.81). In regard to Hong Kong and Macau, the government of Macau scored 8.36, and Hong Kong scored 7.14.     
 

LU Joint Survey


LU Joint Survey

 

The survey also asked participants to evaluate their overall impression of Hong Kong and Macau. The results reveal that most respondents perceive Hong Kong to be “an economically developed city” (83.36%) , “a highly international city” (85%), “a shopping paradise” (83.55%) and “an open city” (68.85%). However, when evaluating whether Hong Kong is “a city with good social management”, “a safe city”, “an inclusive city” and “a friendly city” , the scores were relatively low, with responses of 25.1%, 16.16%, 29.81% and 30.96% respectively.   

 

Items

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neither agree nor disagree

Agree

Strongly agree

an economically developed city

0.67%

1.92%

14.04%

56.44%

26.92%

a highly international city

0.48%

1.92%

12.6%

44.42%

40.58%

a shopping paradise

10.96%

1.73%

13.75%

44.42%

39.13%

a city with good urban governance

5.38%

20.96%

48.56%

20.48%

4.62%

a safe city

8.17%

27.79%

47.88%

13.85%

2.31%

an inclusive city

10.87%

23.08%

36.25%

25%

4.81%

an open city

2.5%

6.92%

21.73%

49.04%

19.81%

a friendly city

8.94%

17.79%

42.31%

25.19%

5.77%

 

In regard to the epidemic situation, the survey also shows that over 80 per cent of respondents (80.67%) agreed that mainland China should provide Hong Kong with protective materials, such as facemasks, to help the city fight the epidemic. This is perhaps because the epidemic situation has become stable in the mainland while Hong Kong continues to face greater challenges, especially a comparative shortage of protective materials. In addition, more than 60 per cent of respondents (63.46%) believe that Hong Kong and Macau citizens diagnosed with COVID-19 should be entitled to the same free medical services that are available in their local cities.

 

Prof Joshua Mok Ka-ho, Vice-President of Lingnan University and leader of this research project, states that GBA mainland residents’ evaluation of epidemic prevention in Hong Kong was not negative, as the scores were only slightly inferior than that of the mainland and Macau. However, he stresses that GBA mainland residents’ overall impression of Hong Kong is what requires our attention, and suggests that after the epidemic, the Hong Kong government should reference anti-epidemic work from around the world and review its own actions.